This process is applicable only to analytical questions.
What is happening factually?
Isolate the legally relevant facts:
Steps of analysis
(1) What is the legal issue?
(2) What rule of law addresses this issue?
(3) What should be the outcome?
Identify the issue in each answer choice:
- (A)
- (B)
- (C)
- (D)
(4) What answer choice best corresponds to my answer?
Work the question before you look at the choices. Step 3 — deciding what the outcome should be — comes before you read (A) through (D), not after. The most common way to lose a multiple-choice question you actually know is to let a plausible distractor tell you what the issue was.